10 Q&A Scenario Based: Networking, Cloud, DevOps and Cybersecurity (Part 1)

 These questions are focused on networking for DevOps, cloud, and cybersecurity and help you to learn quickly!

1. Scenario: You need to ensure that traffic between your web servers and database servers in a hybrid cloud setup is encrypted and routed efficiently. Which of the following would best achieve this?

A) IPSec with BGP routing

B) AWS Direct Connect with VPC Peering

C) GRE Tunneling with Static Routing

D) OpenVPN with Route 53


Correct Answer: A) IPSec with BGP routing

Explanation: IPSec encrypts the traffic while BGP routing efficiently handles dynamic routing in hybrid cloud environments. Direct Connect with VPC Peering is better for connecting AWS resources directly, but does not inherently provide encryption. GRE tunneling does not offer encryption by default, and OpenVPN is more suited for remote access VPNs, not efficient hybrid cloud routing.



2. Scenario:
In a Kubernetes cluster deployed in AWS, you need to ensure that all external traffic passes through a load balancer before reaching the pods. Which AWS service would you use?

A) AWS Route 53

B) AWS ELB (Elastic Load Balancer)

C) AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall)

D) AWS CloudFront


Correct Answer: B) AWS ELB (Elastic Load Balancer)

Explanation: AWS ELB distributes traffic among instances, ensuring that external traffic reaches the pods effectively. Route 53 handles DNS routing, WAF provides web application security, and CloudFront offers content delivery but is not primarily responsible for balancing traffic across pods.


3. Scenario: Your team must securely connect multiple VPCs across different AWS regions. Which method would provide the most efficient and secure connectivity?

A) VPC Peering

B) AWS Direct Connect

C) Transit Gateway with IPSec

D) Site-to-Site VPN with VPC Flow Logs


Correct Answer: C) Transit Gateway with IPSec

Explanation: Transit Gateway provides efficient connectivity between multiple VPCs across regions, and IPSec adds security by encrypting the traffic. VPC Peering connects VPCs but lacks centralization for multi-region setups. Direct Connect offers a dedicated link but is more suitable for connecting on-premise resources to AWS. Site-to-Site VPN offers security but is less efficient for multiple regions.


4. Scenario: You are asked to implement a security solution that protects your cloud-based web applications from DDoS attacks and provides application-level filtering. Which combination would be the best choice?

A) AWS Shield Advanced and AWS WAF

B) AWS GuardDuty and VPC Network ACLs

C) AWS Inspector and AWS Secrets Manager

D) AWS Config and AWS Firewall Manager


Correct Answer: A) AWS Shield Advanced and AWS WAF

Explanation: AWS Shield Advanced provides DDoS protection, while AWS WAF offers application-layer filtering. GuardDuty detects threats but doesn’t prevent DDoS, Inspector is for vulnerability scanning, and AWS Config/Firewall Manager focus on compliance and policy enforcement, not direct threat mitigation.


5. Scenario: Your organization is deploying applications in a multi-cloud environment, and you need to ensure secure connectivity between resources in AWS and Azure. What is the best method for achieving this?

A) VPC Peering in AWS and Virtual Network Peering in Azure

B) IPSec VPN with BGP across both cloud environments

C) AWS Direct Connect and Azure ExpressRoute

D) Hybrid Cloud DNS with Route 53 and Azure DNS


Correct Answer: B) IPSec VPN with BGP across both cloud environments

Explanation: IPSec VPN with BGP allows for secure, encrypted connections across multi-cloud environments, ensuring dynamic routing. VPC/Virtual Network Peering works within a single cloud provider, Direct Connect/ExpressRoute provide dedicated connections to on-premise environments, and DNS services are for routing traffic, not secure connectivity.


6. Scenario: Your DevOps team is tasked with ensuring that only secure traffic reaches the production web servers hosted on AWS. Which combination of AWS services would help enforce this?

A) AWS Security Groups and VPC Network ACLs

B) AWS GuardDuty and AWS Inspector

C) AWS Shield Standard and AWS Secrets Manager

D) AWS CloudTrail and AWS Config


Correct Answer: A) AWS Security Groups and VPC Network ACLs

Explanation: Security Groups control inbound and outbound traffic at the instance level, while VPC Network ACLs enforce network-level traffic rules. GuardDuty/Inspector focus on threat detection and scanning, Shield/Secrets Manager focus on DDoS protection and secrets management, and CloudTrail/Config provide logging and configuration monitoring.


7. Scenario: You need to ensure data encryption in transit for a multi-region web application running on AWS. Which service would be best suited for this purpose?

A) AWS KMS (Key Management Service)

B) AWS CloudHSM

C) TLS with AWS Certificate Manager (ACM)

D) AWS Shield Advanced


Correct Answer: C) TLS with AWS Certificate Manager (ACM)

Explanation: TLS ensures encryption in transit, and AWS ACM manages the SSL/TLS certificates needed for secure communication. KMS and CloudHSM manage encryption keys but are more suited for encryption at rest. AWS Shield Advanced is for DDoS protection, not encryption in transit.


8. Scenario: You need to set up a secure multi-region architecture that ensures low-latency access for your global users while also securing the traffic. Which AWS services would you leverage?

A) AWS CloudFront and AWS WAF

B) AWS Route 53 and AWS GuardDuty

C) AWS Global Accelerator and AWS Shield Advanced

D) AWS VPC Peering and AWS Secrets Manager


Correct Answer: C) AWS Global Accelerator and AWS Shield Advanced

Explanation: AWS Global Accelerator ensures low-latency routing to the nearest region, while Shield Advanced provides DDoS protection. CloudFront/WAF is a good option for content delivery but lacks multi-region routing. Route 53 provides DNS, and GuardDuty detects threats, but neither provides low-latency routing. VPC Peering and Secrets Manager serve different use cases.


9. Scenario: Your company needs to provide internal team members secure access to cloud resources without exposing them to the internet. What’s the best solution?

A) VPN Gateway with MFA

B) AWS Direct Connect with IAM roles

C) AWS PrivateLink and Bastion Host

D) AWS Transit Gateway with S3 Bucket Policies


Correct Answer: C) AWS PrivateLink and Bastion Host

Explanation: AWS PrivateLink ensures internal access to cloud services without internet exposure, and Bastion Host provides a secure entry point. VPN Gateway with MFA is secure but exposes services to the internet. Direct Connect/IAM is focused on dedicated connectivity and identity management, and Transit Gateway with S3 policies isn’t designed for secure internal access.


10. Scenario: You are responsible for securing a cloud-native application that uses multiple microservices across Kubernetes clusters. How would you secure inter-service communication?

A) Use TLS encryption with mTLS across the services

B) Implement Kubernetes NetworkPolicies for all services

C) Use AWS WAF to block unauthorized requests

D) Implement a service mesh with Istio or Linkerd


Correct Answer: D) Implement a service mesh with Istio or Linkerd

Explanation: A service mesh like Istio or Linkerd provides comprehensive security features like mTLS for securing inter-service communication. TLS encryption and NetworkPolicies help but do not offer the same level of control. AWS WAF is not suitable for internal communication; it’s designed for external traffic filtering.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Free Courses - Git & GitHub (DevOps)

6 FREE courses to learn AWS & AWS DevOps (Concepts + Hands-on + Interview)